Talk:Quince
Quince is currently an Agriculture, food and drink good article nominee. Nominated by Chiswick Chap (talk) at 10:15, 5 November 2024 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page. Short description: Flowering plant and fruit |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Quince/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 10:15, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: BigChrisKenney (talk · contribs) 03:07, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, @Chiswick Chap: I'll be reviewing this article for the January 2025 GAN Backlog Drive.
- Many thanks!
Intro
[edit]Good!
Description
[edit]Made and edit you may wish to review.
- All right.
History
[edit]Added a link you may wish to review.
- Tweaked.
Cultivation
[edit]Good!
Uses
[edit]I made an edit you may wish to review.
- Tweaked.
Cultural associations
[edit]Good!
Inital Review
Another great article with minimum alterations needing to be made. I will await your reply before posting my final assesment. BigChrisKenney (talk) 05:02, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done.
Sources
[edit][11] I am not sure why this is here. It references another Wikipedia article, Theophrastus, and that article does not mention quince, then following a link to his Enquiry into Plants, that doesn't mention quince either. Consider removal?
- It's certainly a relevant fact, and it's supported by a full and (on inspection) correct citation to a chapter and section of Theophrastus's book. There is no reason why such a fact should be in the biography or book article, as these cover much broader subjects.
[28] The archived, original link is dead. BigChrisKenney (talk) 00:47, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Link is marked as such.
- Good article nominees
- Good article nominees on review
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- B-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- B-Class plant articles
- High-importance plant articles
- WikiProject Plants articles
- B-Class Food and drink articles
- High-importance Food and drink articles
- WikiProject Food and drink articles
- B-Class Agriculture articles
- Mid-importance Agriculture articles
- WikiProject Agriculture articles